Popular now
Grant Thornton UK names Ed Hammond and Camilla de Bernhard as directors

Grant Thornton UK names Ed Hammond and Camilla de Bernhard as directors

PKF Brenson Lawlor completes merger with N. O’Carroll & Company

PKF Brenson Lawlor completes merger with N. O’Carroll & Company

Leonard Curtis appoints associate director in Manchester

Leonard Curtis appoints associate director in Manchester

Supreme Court rules against Mastercard and Visa in interchange fees battle 

Supreme Court rules against Mastercard and Visa in interchange fees battle 

Register to get free articles

No spam Unsubscribe anytime

Want unlimited access? View Plans

Already have an account? Sign in

Visa and Mastercard could be set to pay billions in compensation to some of the UK’s top retailers following a court ruling which found that the two payment companies had breached competition laws.

The Supreme Court today (17 June) unanimously upheld the conclusion of the Court of Appeal that the multi-lateral interchange fees (MIFs) – that are paid by retailers for the processing of card transactions – restricted competition.

According to a report by the Financial Times, three separate appeal cases were rejected by The Supreme Court.

Retailers involved in the action for compensation include Asda, Argos, Sainsbury’s and Morrisons. Reports claim that the exact value of the payout will be determined in future court rulings.

Supreme Court justice, Lord Hamblen, said: “In the Supreme Court’s judgment, the Court of Appeal was wrong to allow Mastercard to reopen this issue, which it had lost after a full and fair trial. It offends against the strong principle of public policy and justice that there should be finality in litigation.”

Kate Pollock, head of competition litigation at law firm Stewarts, which represented Asda, Argos and Morrison’s, told the FT: “The Supreme Court’s definitive finding on liability means that our clients’ claims can now proceed to trial on the issue of the quantum of damages. They look forward to a swift resolution of the matter without further delay.”

The appeal cases date back as far as 1992, and although today’s judgment moves the possibility of compensation into view for the affected retailers, Mastercard pointed out in a statement that the decision is not final.

Previous Post
Hurst unveils new Manchester office

Hurst unveils new Manchester office

Next Post
How construction can lead the way for accountants on the insolvency front line

How construction can lead the way for accountants on the insolvency front line

Secret Link