Popular now
Affinia expands Midlands presence with Towcester acquisition

Affinia expands Midlands presence with Towcester acquisition

The Uncommon Practice appoints director to lead regional growth

The Uncommon Practice appoints director to lead regional growth

Talent shortages force accountancy firms to turn away clients

Talent shortages force accountancy firms to turn away clients

CIOT calls for ‘greater role’ for OTS

CIOT calls for ‘greater role’ for OTS

Register to get free articles

No spam Unsubscribe anytime

Want unlimited access? View Plans

Already have an account? Sign in

The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) has argued that The Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) should have a “greater role” in scrutiny of new tax proposals.

The new role could include the development of a formal simplification framework against which the OTS can measure government proposals, and score its own recommendations.

In response, the institute said it wants the government to consider “formally embedding” a role for the OTS in the five stage tax policy development process.

The institution has also called for the government to formally respond to all OTS reviews and recommendations within a prescribed period, indicating in detail which recommendations will be taken forward.

Furthermore, the group would like to see an expanded OTS role which includes post-enactment review of new legislation perhaps two to three years after implementation.

John Barnett, chair of the CIOT’s tax policy and oversight committee, said: “The OTS has done a lot of good work since it was launched 11 years ago.

“We see the work of a strengthened OTS fitting into three areas going forward: scrutiny of new tax measures, periodic revisiting of its earlier recommendations, and a continuation of the existing cycle of reviews of policy areas.”

He added: “OTS needs direct access to ministers to put its case (as we recommend), but ministers also need to recognise that tax simplification is not something they can delegate to the OTS – it requires their engagement and they need to be willing to amend or drop otherwise attractive proposals if the complexity cost is too high.”

Previous Post
EY bolsters tax and law department with 14 promotions

EY bolsters tax and law department with 14 promotions

Next Post
Accountancy bodies partner for race to net zero

Accountancy bodies partner for race to net zero

Secret Link